Comments
-
To clarify, I have a working IPv6 at WAN port.
-
Yes, I've read it previously and made NAT policies with access rules as suggested. I got 0 (zero) usage count. In my opinion this KB article is way poorer than other articles, feelis like a draft that went published.
-
Thanks @ARKWRIGHT. Server "mailer" is inside network. I've posted my issue in details here (https://community.sonicwall.com/technology-and-support/discussion/5528/translate-ipv4-to-ipv6). Please have a look if you can, I would be (very) glad to hear some ideas on this.
-
Thanks, I'm still trying here. So I think you should consider unmark that post as "CORRECT ANSWER" since it may be misleading.
-
How did you solve this? I'm also trying a similar layout: DNS has www.company.com to IPv4 and mailer.company.com to IPv6; SonicWall has both IPv4 and IPv6 set at WAN port Internal LAN devices are all IPv4 I'm trying to make a NAT policy to translate IPv4 to IPv6.
-
Thanks, this solved my issue. I still don't know why two rules didn't work, guess something else changes when user select "Ping" for the WAN interface. Can you please clarify?
-
Thanks. Regarding NAT, it was not needed to create (or one was created automatically by the OS). Is ACL a "Mac Filter list"? In my case, being a guest wifi, would it be the case to use it?
-
Solution for this case: firewall forwarding to a NGINX server, and this proxy to our internal servers
-
I did try to create a second DMZ but the firewall would direct to only one server (app.contoso.com or dev.contoso.com) according to who comes first on the priority list
-
Hi @BWC thanks for your reply. I will try this this solution.
-
Hi @John_Lasersohn thanks. Did you finished your research? Hi @Ajishlal thanks, but this is applied to only one web server into one public IP. My need is to resolve two hostnames (two different servers) into one public IP.